YISROEL WEINBERG

   Nursing Homes Affiliated with YISROEL WEINBERG

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that YISROEL WEINBERG is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.

NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Beloit Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 110 BELOIT, WI Ranking: #28 out of 34 (Ranking List)
Burlington Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: managing employee	No. of Beds: 123 BURLINGTON, WI Ranking: #58 out of 61 (Ranking List)
Dyersburg Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: officer	No. of Beds: 123 DYERSBURG, TN Ranking: #13 out of 13 (Ranking List)
Eastview Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 118 ANTIGO, WI Ranking: #1 out of 6 (Ranking List)
Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: officer	No. of Beds: 180 MEMPHIS, TN Ranking: #18 out of 34 (Ranking List)
Madison Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 83 MADISON, WI Ranking: #29 out of 29 (Ranking List)
Manahawkin Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 MANAHAWKIN, NJ Ranking: #30 out of 33 (Ranking List)
Maplewood Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 120 AMESBURY, MA Ranking: #73 out of 76 (Ranking List)
Monroe Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: officer	No. of Beds: 85 MADISONVILLE, TN Ranking: #10 out of 15 (Ranking List)
Muskego Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 49 MUSKEGO, WI Ranking: #31 out of 70 (Ranking List)
North Ridge Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 94 MANITOWOC, WI Ranking: #14 out of 14 (Ranking List)
Nu Roc Health and Rehabilitation Ctr Role: director	No. of Beds: 50 LAONA, WI Ranking: #1 out of 2 (Ranking List)
Oconto Health and Rehab Center Role: operational/managerial control	No. of Beds: 50 OCONTO, WI Ranking: #12 out of 14 (Ranking List)
Saugus Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 80 SAUGUS, MA Ranking: #141 out of 180 (Ranking List)
Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 81 KENOSHA, WI Ranking: #35 out of 38 (Ranking List)
St Ann Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 50 MILWAUKEE, WI Ranking: #58 out of 58 (Ranking List)
Suring Health and Rehab Center Role: operational/managerial control	No. of Beds: 50 SURING, WI Ranking: #6 out of 8 (Ranking List)
Twin Oaks Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 101 DANVERS, MA Ranking: #136 out of 148 (Ranking List)
Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: director	No. of Beds: 128 KENOSHA, WI Ranking: #32 out of 38 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

   Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with YISROEL WEINBERG

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that YISROEL WEINBERG was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Cranbrook Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 39 DETROIT, MI Ranking: #35 out of 135 (Ranking List)
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Elmwood Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 DETROIT, MI Ranking: #85 out of 128 (Ranking List)
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Woodward Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 129 DETROIT, MI Ranking: #76 out of 128 (Ranking List)
Waterfall Health of Wausau Most Recent Record: 03/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 80 WAUSAU, WI Ranking: #8 out of 8 (Ranking List)
BAY AT MAPLE RIDGE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION (THE Most Recent Record: 04/01/2019 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 133 GREEN BAY, WI

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

  About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database

Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.

The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:

• 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
• DIRECTOR
• MANAGING EMPLOYEE
• OFFICER
• OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
• PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.